Monday, January 7, 2013

50 Years of Bond



While watching Skyfall, my boyfriend whispered an excellent question in my ear: "If James Bond is such a great spy, why does he keep telling people his full name?"

Indeed.

I suppose in this day and age, obvious plot holes like that in a film franchise are far more glaring. We pick apart movies. We dissect them like unfortunate frogs in a high school science class, only to post our findings on the internet for all to see (much like I'm doing now).

This is the new internet age, where the word "blockbuster" no longer means much more than a participation trophy in little league, and where a films top two concerns are 1) make the most money and 2) get nominated for an award. It's no place for the old and weary.

The Bond franchise recently turned 50, and Skyfall not only provides an excellent benchmark for this milestone, but acknowledges it in a classy way (although, I swear Daniel Craig winked at the camera a few times).

What else would you expect from 007?

The film asks a question of it's audience, and characters: is James Bond past his prime? It's not rhetorical, either. Both in character and film as a whole, it seems the creators are very concerned with not becoming "dated", and yet maintaining the true essence of Bond. They spend the rest of the film trying to convince us of Bond's continued relevancy.

It's risky, and honest, and it works.

Yes, James Bond is a dated character. Yes, the world has changed dramatically since his inception. Yes, we are beginning to enter a new-era of film. But no, this will not spell the end of Bond. Bond adapts, Bond improves, and Bond lives forever.

At least, that's what the filmmakers would have you believe.

It's hard to argue with. The constant reboots, rather than diluting the franchise, have inexplicably made it stronger. Daniel Craig is perhaps one of the most impressive Bonds since Sean Connery, ringing in the new generation of spy films with a gritty resilience that it's difficult to ignore. Maybe Bond doesn't know how to hack a computer. Maybe he doesn't repel down mountains or possess superhuman abilities, maybe he is a little old-school. But guess what?

James Bond doesn't care.


The film proves this point with an incredibly tongue and cheek, yet emotional, storyline which involves Bond's apparent death and subsequent resurrection (which is heavy-handed symbolism at its best). He rejoins the MI6 team just quickly enough to fail all his tests and watch the place get blown to all hell. But who needs tests, right? Who needs a headquarters, or a political mandate? This is Bond. He doesn't care about the rules. 

Bond then begins to seek out the terrorist, a cyber-phenom named Silva (Javier Bardem) and former agent hellbent on assassinating M (Judi Dench) and plunging the global economy into turmoil (at least... more than it already is). I think it's safe to say that Silva is possibly one of the most ridiculous Bond villains ever... in a good way. He is flamboyant, he is cunning, he's full of surprises, and he has an adorable little giggle. Not to mention, anyone who has seen No Country for Old Men knows that Javier Bardem can pull off a stupid looking wig like it's nobodies business.

Bond is joined by a smattering of interesting "new" characters. Most notably, a new Q (the very youthful looking Ben Whishaw), who does nothing if not highlight the intense culture gap Bond faces. Q has a few nifty new skills, which include sweater vests, hacking, hipster glasses, and making Bond feel like a senile old kook.


The climax of the film, which I won't ruin, brings Bond full circle and humanizes him in a very unexpected way. Writers of Bond films have always kept him at arms length, a little mysterious and cool. Craig's emotional, fragile, broken Bond proves the franchise can adapt, and can give audiences the more well-rounded hero they crave.


The ending begs many questions, and hints at a sort of "reboot-within-a-reboot" for Bond. Will they start fresh, yet again? Craig is already signed on for the next 2 Bond films, which would effectively catapult him into the realm of Sean Connery and Roger Moore as one of the longest serving Bonds of all time. One thing is certain, he definitely has earned that kind of company. 

I won't be surprised if the film receives some attention come Oscar time, particularly for the themesong "Skyfall", sung by Adele. The Academy will also (finally) be honoring Bond in celebration of it's 50th Anniversary. However old, I'm confident that Bond will continue to be a constant in the industry (and thank God, the titles are getting better).



4 comments:

  1. Good review. I loved the movie for all its old school character and character(s)... and I love Craig as a gritty, unapologetic Bond. This movie did not disappoint Bond aficionados and hopefully gained a few new ones.
    p.s. what if Bond, James Bond, is a pseudonym? huh? then he's not really giving his real name... I'm just sayin'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought so too, until the end of the film when you realize that it's his real name, because of where they go (remember?)I can't say more without ruining the end!

      Why would he just tell EVERYONE his name! Everyone else in the Bond franchise has a million pseudonyms... Or just uses an initial to identify themselves. Bond practically gives them his social security number when he orders a goddamn drink.

      Delete
  2. Nowadays Bond is more of an agent rather than a spy. Especially in the Daniel Craig era. In Casino Royale he explains why he gives his real name. He is constantly up against the top of the food chain when it comes to organized crime. They already know who he is regardless of the name he gives.

    ReplyDelete